Sunday, 29 November 2009
Please sign the petition:
Saturday, 28 November 2009
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
On the video below, the epidemiologist Tom Jefferson tells a Swedish TV about this change and how it would enormously benefit pharmaceutical companies:
The old text, pre-2009, that can be found in various sites of respected organizations and government agencies, including the WHO, states that:
An influenza pandemic occurs with the appearance of a new influenza virus against which none of the population has any immunity. This results in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of cases and deaths. With the increase in global transport and communications, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions, epidemics resulting from a new influenza virus are likely to be established quickly around the world.
In the new definition, that appeared in May/2009, states that:
A disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that disease than normal. A pandemic is a worldwide epidemic of a disease. An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity. With the increase in global transport, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions in some areas, epidemics due to a new influenza virus are likely to take hold around the world, and become a pandemic faster than before. Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause, and the severity of a pandemic can change over the course of that pandemic.As you may have noticed, the part that says "This results in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of cases and deaths." were removed in the new text, replacing it for the fuzzy and confused statement that "Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause, and the severity of a pandemic can change over the course of that pandemic"
Where you can find the documents that prove this:
- Old definition:
- New definition:
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
According to Balqa Governor Abdul Jalil Sleimat, the phenomenon was discovered by coincidence when a sheep entered an area of land while grazing. According to the shepherd attending the herd, Sleimat said, the sheep caught fire, “was completely burned and disappeared”.
According to Sleimat, the ground in the area was still unusually hot until late Tuesday, and once any material was thrown into the area, it burned quickly and smoke and flames came out.
A committee comprising members of the governorate, the Natural Resources Authority (NRA), the Royal Geographic Centre, the Royal Scientific Society (RSS) and the Civil Defence Department (CDD) was formed to extract samples from the land for examination.
Maher Hijazin, director of the NRA, told Ammonnews.com that the explanation of the phenomenon is “simple”, saying that since the area lies at the end of a sewage pipeline, organic materials might have collected under the surface and interacted in a way that heated up an area of 50-60 square metres.
Jordan Geologists Association President Bahjat Odwan yesterday dismissed the presence of any earthquake or volcanic activity in the area.
In cooperation with the University of Jordan, the association will form a committee of specialists to examine the phenomenon and find its causes, he said.
Odwan agreed it was possible that the phenomenon could be explained by the presence of some underground remnants of organic materials in the area.
A police patrol was placed at the site and the place was completely sealed off with phosphoric tape, Sleimat said. The area’s people were evacuated to ensure their safety, he said, noting that the area, around two dunums, is plain with red soil.
Butrus Hasso, a nearby resident, told The Jordan Times: “It is just a strange thing, so strange.”
“Two fire trucks came earlier in the day, trying to put out the flames and cool the area, but the area continued to be very hot,” he added.
“In the daytime, flames could be seen coming out of the area,” Hasso said.
Hasso said the area was packed with CDD personnel until late in the evening.
Commenting on the phenomenon, Greater Salt Municipality Council member and representative of the Rmemin area Ahmad Kharabsheh said the plot's temperature rose dramatically, burning all grass and trees around it.
In the morning, he told The Jordan Times over phone, an RSS team measured the temperature of the ground at the site and found it to be "400-450 degrees" Celsius.
The area was still ablaze and emitting smoke as of late yesterday evening, Kharabsheh added, noting that the site has been designated a restricted area.
Then check this
ATL - Advanced Tactical Laser
he Advanced Tactical Laser (ATL) ACTD is an innovative concept for airborne ultra-precision strike missions that uses a high-energy laser weapon mounted in a tactical aircraft to engage stationary or moving ground targets. On-board visible and infrared surveillance and acquisition sensors provide the weapon operator scene images of increasing resolution for finding, identifying, and engaging targets. The entire weapon system is envisioned as a package of several self-contained modules that can be installed or removed from the aircraft in a few hours.The ATL uses a closed-cycle, chemical oxygen-iodine laser (COIL) with an appropriate beam control. The closed-cycle system captures waste by-products, making it suitable for tactical employment. The ATL will be installed in a C-130 aircraft to demonstrate its ability to engage tactical targets from a moving platform at ranges of approximately 10 kilometers. This SOCOM demonstration program is important and should be completed in the 2007-2009 timeframe.
The Jordan times: Authorities investigating unusual phenomenon near Salt
Global security: ATL
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
Iain MiGillivray has received a response to his freedom of information request to the department of health in England concerning whether forced vaccinations are possible in the UK under current laws.
The Information Commissioner says it "might theoretically be possible to introduce a mandatory vaccination scheme in some exceptional circumstances under the CCA."
The Civil Continegencies Act (CCA) explicity states a pandemic would constitute an emergency for the purposes of the CCA.
Also, the Information commissioner states that the Department of Health Immunisation Branch holds no information about any known side-effects of the swine flu vaccine.
Links are provided to European Medicines Agency documents that contain an admission that Guillain Barre Syndrome, encephelomyelitis among other conditions are included in the possible side effects:
In addition, the Information Commissioner defines martial law as "that state of affairs which exists in time of war", and not as a state of affairs which exists in a time of "emergency", so that the military character of the response to the pandemic emergency is not adequately addressed.
This is the full answer from the Information Commissioner:
Our ref: DE439464
8 September 2009
Dear Mr McGillivray
Thank you for your email of 28 August, which asked, under the Freedom of Information Act, a number of questions about the H1N1 influenza vaccine. I have answered your specific questions in the order in which they appeared in your request. You requested:
1. A complete list of the ingredients of the vaccine being purchased by the UK Government for the H1N1 influenza
The Department of Health does not hold this information. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to provide this information to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) as part of licensing requirements.
The complete details of the H5N1 ‘mock-up’ vaccines’ ingredients upon which the swine flu vaccine are based can be found here:
Celvapan (name subject to final licensing agreement)
Pandemrix (name subject to final licensing agreement)
The complete list of ingredients of the swine flu vaccine will be available from the EMEA once the product is licensed.
2. A complete list of any known side effects of any of the vaccine ingredients
The Department of Health Immunisation Branch holds no information about any known side-effects of the swine flu vaccine.
The possible side effects of the vaccine will be listed in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) when the products are licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). As the H1N1 vaccines are not licensed yet, the SPC is not currently available.
The SPCs listing possible side effects of the H5N1 'mock-up' vaccines on which the H1N1 vaccines will be based are also available in the EMEA weblinks listed above.
You may also find it useful to read the “Summary for the public document” listed on the EMEA’s European Public Assessment Report web pages for the 'mock-up' vaccines:
3. The suppliers of the H1N1 influenza vaccine to the UK Government
The Department has a contract with two companies to supply vaccine – Baxter and GSK.
Please note, the three questions that follow were framed as clarifications, and as such, we can only offer broad-based advice.
4. Clarification of whether or not the UK Government has, in any circumstances such as a national state of emergency, the legal authority (under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 or other legislation) to order mandatory vaccination for all citizens and if so what measures could be taken against individuals who refuse the H1N1 vaccine for themselves and/or their children. Also clarification of which parts of the United Kingdom for which the UK Government has the authority to introduce mandatory vaccination.
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 provides a framework to enable the government to take exceptional powers to help deal with the most serious of emergencies. Any use would be evaluated on a case by case basis and subject to a robust set of safeguards. Before powers under the Civil Contingencies Act can be considered they must pass the triple lock mechanism set out under the Act itself, essentially these are that:
1. An emergency that threatens serious damage to human welfare, the environment or security has occurred, is occurring or is about to occur;
2. It is necessary to make provision urgently in order to resolve the emergency, as existing powers are insufficient and it is not possible to bring forward legislation in the usual way because of the need to act urgently; and
3. The emergency regulations are proportionate to the aspect or effect of the emergency that they are directed at.
In addition, any use of emergency powers must be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998.
Any use of emergency regulations would be made by the Queen by Order in Council or by a senior Minister in cases of urgency and would need to be endorsed by Parliament. If the regulations were to apply in the area of a Devolved Administration, there are requirements to consult with that Administration; the Devolved Administrations do not have the authority themselves under the CCA to introduce such a scheme.
While it might theoretically be possible to introduce a mandatory vaccination scheme in some exceptional circumstances under the CCA, there are no plans to do so in response to the swine flu outbreak. Everyone has a right to refuse the swine flu vaccine and where a child is too young to consent themselves to being vaccinated, the right to decide rests with the person with parental responsibility.
5. Clarification of whether any (and which) international organisations (such as the E.U. and the World Health Organisation) would have the authority to override UK Government policy in the event of an H1N1 influenza pandemic.
Under the International Health Regulations (IHR), the WHO may issue standing and temporary recommendations to State parties, which includes the UK. Whilst it is expressly stated in the IHR that recommendations may cover requiring vaccination, all recommendations issued by the WHO are not binding on the State parties. Hence, the UK would not be legally obliged to comply with any recommendation issued by WHO which related to compulsory vaccination.
The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 was recent amended by the Health and Social Care Act 2008 to enable the UK government to enact WHO recommendations, in line with the International Health Regulations. However, the one part of the IHR that was rejected was the ability to require medical treatment. The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 Part 2 Section 45E explicitly prohibits regulations from requiring a person to undergo medical treatment including vaccination and other prophylactic treatment.
The EU only has authority to act in respect of matters devolved to it through the EU treaty. The EU Treaty does not enable the EU to bring forward binding legislation in respect of compulsory vaccination.
6. Clarification of whether or not (and under what circumstances) martial law could be imposed in the United Kingdom in the event of a disease pandemic, whether martial law could be used to administer vaccines by force (i.e. under physical restraint) if people refuse vaccination and (where applicable) what impact this would have on the authority of devolved administrations.
You asked about whether or not martial law could be imposed in the United Kingdom in the event of a disease pandemic. Martial law can be defined as that state of affairs which exists in time of war, when the Crown by proclamation, or by notice issued by the military authorities, warns the public that certain offences will be tried and punished by a military court. Consequently martial law is not relevant in the circumstance of a flu pandemic.
I hope that this is helpful. If you are unhappy with the Department’s handling of the Freedom of Information aspect of your request, you have the right to ask for an internal review. Internal review requests should be submitted within two months of the date of receipt of the response to your original letter and should be addressed to:
Head of the Freedom of Information Team
Department of Health
If you are not content with the outcome of your complaint, you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally, the ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted the complaints procedure provided by the Department. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
The Information Commissioner’s Office
Please contact me if you have any queries about this letter.
FOI Case Manager
Thursday, 17 September 2009
Former Kansas state trooper Greg Evensen underscored this claim last week. “Have you been made aware of the massive roadblock plans to stop all travelers for a vaccine bracelet (stainless steel band with a micro-chip on board) that will force you to take the shot?” Evensen wrote on July 29. “Refuse it? You will be placed on a prison bus and taken to a quarantine camp. What will you do when your children are NOT allowed into school without the shot? What will you do when you are not allowed into the workplace without the vaccine paperwork? Buy groceries? Go to the bank? Shop anywhere?? Get on a plane, bus or train? Use the toilet in the mall? Nope. Police officers will become loathed, feared, despised and remembered for their ‘official’ duties.”
Mr. Evensen made the following comment at an event in Texas:
Tuesday, 15 September 2009
"In Latin America, where there is a US military base there are military coups," Evo Morales told Bolivian immigrants living in Spain on Sunday.
Morales along with his allies in South America have repeatedly criticized the deal between Colombia and the US that would give the US military access to seven Colombian bases for a 10 year period.
Jane is a young woman living in Vienna who, while working as a medical editor, was horrified to learn in early 2009 of the fiasco in which a Baxter International research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria, sent a quantity of human H3N2 viral material to 18 European laboratories.
Wednesday, 10 June 2009
June 9, 2009
Newsweek assistant managing editor Evan Thomas tells Chris Matthews that Obama is sort of like a god standing above the country. Just when you thought MSNBC couldn’t get any more slavering and fawning, they pull a hack editor-at-large out of a hat who knocks one out of the ballpark.
Over the weekend on Inside Washington, Thomas said Obama, in regard to the conflict in the Middle East, is a “great teacher” who “stands above everybody.” He did say that “there’s some condescension” in this attitude. “But, he stands above everybody and says, ‘Now, listen. You people have to stop blaming each other unreasonably. You have to get along here and I am going to show you the way.’”
It was classic example of the cult of personality. “A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader uses mass media to create a heroic public image through unquestioning flattery and praise. Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships,” Wikipedia summarizes.
Stalin and Mao were experts at manipulating the cult of personality. Both dictators portrayed themselves as larger than life and endowed with unrivaled wisdom. Thomas is doing the same thing with Obama.
The ultimate result of the dictatorial rule of Stalin and Mao was mass murder on an unprecedented scale.
Can we expect the same from Obama?
June 9, 2009
Saturday, 6 June 2009
Unfortuately the censorship was imposed. As I mentioned before, certain people successed into removing the detailed information of the 2009 meeting.
Please give your support here:
Talk page of the manin bilderberg meeting
We will have to create an appeal to review the removal of that page, if someone more experienced on this would come forward and help me, it would be great.
I had added so many sources to it, Dutch TV news with press news, and others, and it is all gone!!!! Please help!!!!
The Bilderberg meetings happens every year with the 150 most important, influent and rich people in the world. In 2009 the meeting happened in Greece, getting great coverage from the mainstream media.
I created a 2009 Bilderberg wikipedia article, which has been attacked and censored, and now agents of desinformation try to remove the entire page using very weak justifications, to say the least.
That's how I answered they arguments for removal:
- "That the guardian article had a great coverage but was only referenced": an initial summary was done based on the article, but with a lot of space for expantion. The removal of the page won't help for the completeness of the subject.
- "That participants had been already mentioned in the main article and to use the list of participants": in the main article of the main subjets you will find a summary about the last of even all of its sub-parts. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain%27s_Got_Talent#Series_three and Britain%27s_Got_Talent_%28series_3%29. About moving the names to the list of participants, that list doens't give an idea of the cronology, so you can't see easily who went in the last meeting, and finally we need to have cohesion here, why not keeping all the known and relably sourced information about this especific event all in the same page, the 2009 Bilderberg_Meeting page.
- "Regarding the security, the only non-trivial is said to be worthless because the jornalist didn't named his source." it'ś on the right of the jornalist to not reveal directly his source, that doesn't take the credibility of the information. And after all, the excessive security was confirmed accross the whole series of the Guardianś article and others.
- "That the majority of the article is not notable and the fact of the few jornalists that covered the event have been detained and followed is not notable.". What is more notable then, Susan Boyle ending up in the hospital? Or all the results of all Britain's Got Talent have its place on wikipedia? Is this more important than a secret and highly secure catching up of the 130 more important, influent and rich people in the world under a black-out of the mainstream media?
The separated page nothing has to do with fork of point of view, it's only a way to better structure the article and to avoid getting too big main pages. Labeling Bilderberg Group "conspiracy fancruft" without better reasoning show that the person doesn't have any knowledge on the subject.
The 2003 article was already "merged", in practice deleted, which created a precedent to not allow any detail on the Bilderberg Meetings in wikipedia.
Please help to improve and source the articles. Let's not let them ravage the articles.
Page about the 2009 meeting
Page for article removal. Leave your opinion there.
Thursday, 4 June 2009
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm … Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.” 
 4. Cmdr. William Guy Carr: Quoted in Satan: Prince of This World, Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
Thursday, 21 May 2009
This article will be the first of the "BigBrother Uk" series. On it, I will expose how the british government is gradually deploying a totalitarian state, on lines of the book/movie 1984.
There are thousands of CCTV's in the roads, laws controling the internet, photos forbidden on the streets, among other things that appear more a orwellian movie.
This post is about the FTAC, or "Fixated Threat Assesment Centre¨, and its use to intimidate critics of the government. Sounds strange, but this department, established secretly in 2006, mix physicians with police, to find and investigate people that can be a threat to themselves or to others.
In 2007, Tony McNulty, answering a question during a session of the parliament about the FTAC, answered:
"The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was established in order to better protect the public and vulnerable individuals in response to evidence that a significant proportion of people who engage in bizarre communications or contact with prominent people in public life are severely and acutely mentally ill and urgently need professional help. A small but significant number of such individuals can pose a risk to the public, the prominent person, and themselves, particularly in environments where there are armed police officers. The Home Office, the Department of Health and the Metropolitan Police Service agreed to establish a joint police/mental health unit, on a pilot basis, to assess and manage the risk posed by such individuals. Where appropriate, FTAC will introduce (or reintroduce) the individuals into existing community mental health care through established pathways. If offences are disclosed, and the circumstances warrant such intervention, consideration will also be given to a criminal investigation."
In the timesonline, the police department states:
"The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre is a joint initiative between the Metropolitan Police, Home Office and Department of Health. Its role is to assess, manage and reduce potential risks and threats from fixated individuals, against people in public life, particularly protected VIPs. Fixated individuals are those who are abnormally preoccupied with certain ideas or people. Research has shown that a small minority exhibit violent behaviour"
Well, you can easily feel that something here doesn't smell very good. From using this law against someone that criticize the government is a very very short step. Well, that's was exactly what happened.
Bring "Mr.X", a citizen that in a letter to Jacqui Smith, Home Secretary, called her a communist. What surprised Mr. X was when he got to know that his GP had received a letter from the FTAC, after direct instructions from Jacqui Smith!!!!!
Michael Dewar, in his blog says:
"A person incarcerated by a psychiatrist has no rights whatsoever. Even Stalin had to produce his prisoners in court eventually. The miserable occupants of Guantanamo retain the certainty that one day they will face justice, or at least that they will have their day in court; the occupants of psychiatric prisons have no such comfort. It is a thin line that separates a rule of law democracy from a totalitarian dictatorship. The FTAC crosses that line. For many years our individual freedoms have been incrementally cut away. The FTAC rips the flesh off freedom and lays bare the bones of repression for all decent and honest people to see."
What really pisses me off is that any of this reaches any newspaper. Well, actually doesn't surprise me that much, knowing the influence of the Elites over the mainstream media..
- Parliament FTAC discussion transcription
- Times on Line article
- ukcolumn article